My experience was that they do not listen, do not respond, but if they like the input they do use it as theirs own — meaning, they are the first pirate of the idea. The sad thing is, that they are now self-serving and side with major clients (Selfish Monopolies) but in the past this was not the case, for example IBM had been a major client since about 1920 but has not penetrated the USA-PTO with its interests being served like Google, Apple or Microsoft and Adobe.
Wisdom keep winingOur shared Wisdom keep wining for the last 14 years we have been sharing it with visitors and members of this website and its related […]
Yes, the way to win is not enter the market as small entity without a strong partner already in the industry who will welcome your projects and thank you for the opportunity. This is so you are not sorry, and will not have to be one of the 2%-6% who can see success (Do not be among the 94%-98% who have lost more than gained from investing in innovation)
Why are potential investors not acting wiser to verify new opportunities with safe growth, and are still conservatively choosing to pay more and enter later when they will only get little return on capital, if there will be a need for new investors at the time when they like to enter?
For those new to the issue of inventors having lost the ability to stop large corporations from just taking valuable, patented technologies, there is a short description, published by US Inventor Group.
I see that a patent application was submitted for the aparatuse invented by the inventor for Superior Hulls Inc. I wonder about investment opportunity in such important new technology for boats and ships ? !
This new proposal is so to mend the real damages of the PTAB process that Big Business has induced the USAPTO to implement against its original mandate to exist as Patent registry for stimulating economic growth […]
Visite our new website for investment, if you are interested in a safe and very promising new Advanced Maritime Opportunity – found at https://surfins.ca/wp/
Unfortunately, in our times, employing the OLD ways of Patent Protection are DANGEROUS because there is not ample protection for inventors who are not financially and mentally superiorly strong. Disappointments stats after your first discovery that you have a valuable invention to offer the markets.
Yes, so I have proposed to the new Director of the USAPTO to look at the proposed update and upgrade of its services according to its granted mandate to exist plus enriching it with most modern capabilities.
My experience was that they do not listen, do not respond, but if they like the input they do use it as theirs own — meaning, they are the first pirate of the idea. The sad thing is, that they are now self-serving and side with major clients (Selfish Monopolies) but in the past this was not the case, for example IBM had been a major client since about 1920 but has not penetrated the USA-PTO with its interests being served like Google, Apple or Microsoft and Adobe.